Date: June 25, 2005
Location: Seattle, Washington
On June 25, 2005, Seattle basked in sunshine, the temperature rising to 24°C, with a light breeze pushing white clouds over Elliott Bay. In Capitol Hill, where historic homes and trendy bars mingled with galleries, a laid-back summer vibe prevailed. In 2005, Capitol Hill was a hub of Seattle’s alternative culture, with spots like Elliott Bay Book Company drawing 50,000 visitors monthly, offering books starting at $10. But challenges lurked beneath the calm: the Seattle Police Department reported 120 petty thefts in the area that year, keeping locals on edge.
James Crowe, a 38-year-old private detective, sat in his Broadway office, reviewing notes on his recent cases: Lillian Grayson’s disappearance and the forged Picasso paintings. His office was unchanged: a scratched wooden desk, a corkboard with photos pinned haphazardly, and an old Mr. Coffee machine humming in the corner—though this time, Crowe had forgotten to turn it off, and it began emitting a strange hissing sound.
“If I don’t figure out this coffee maker, it might solve a case faster than I do,” he muttered with self-deprecating humor, switching it off. “Or maybe it’s just telling me I drink too much coffee.”
Crowe leaned back in his chair, his gaze settling on the corkboard, where a note labeled “Alaskan Way Heist, 2004” hung among the photos and scribbles. That unsolved case still gnawed at him, but his recent successes—rescuing Lillian and exposing the art forgeries—reminded him why he became a detective. Over 11 years, Crowe had developed a unique investigative method, blending Sherlock Holmes’ classic techniques, Philip Marlowe’s intuition, and his own modern adaptations for the 2000s.
The Crowe Method: Observation, Logic, and Improvisation
Crowe always started with meticulous observation, a technique he called the “360 Method.” He’d learned it in 1994 while working as an assistant to a private detective in Portland—a 60-year-old veteran named Henry Woods, who’d solved 200 cases in his career. Woods taught Crowe to survey a crime scene from every angle, noting the smallest details: tire tracks, the position of objects, even how shadows fell on the floor. Crowe refined this approach with “mental reconstruction,” picturing himself as the criminal to retrace their steps. In Lillian’s case, this helped him notice the shattered glass on her balcony, indicating a struggle. In the forgery case, it drew his attention to Nicholas Blake’s nervous finger-tapping.
He stepped out of the office to test a theory about the heist but first stopped by Capitol Hill Hardware at the corner of Broadway to buy a $15 screwdriver set. The shop was run by Bill Thompson, a 50-year-old man with a gray beard and a flannel shirt, who always kept an old jukebox in the corner playing 70s tunes. Today, Queen’s “Bohemian Rhapsody” filled the air, and Bill was singing along—badly.
The genuine version of this novel can be found on another site. Support the author by reading it there.
“Crowe, you fixing something again?” Bill asked, grinning. “Or is this for another case?”
“Let’s just say, Bill, I’m planning to unscrew more than bolts—I’ve got an old mystery to crack,” Crowe replied with a faint smile. “But if I fail, I might set up a repair shop here. A little competition wouldn’t hurt you.”
Back at the office, Crowe spread his tools on the desk. He wasn’t a tech enthusiast, though he used basic gadgets in 2005: a Canon PowerShot A520 camera, bought in 2004 to photograph crime scenes, and a Sony ICD-BX700 recorder for interviews. But his real strength lay in improvisation. In the forgery case, he’d used a magnifying glass to inspect the paint texture on the “Picassos,” noticing it was too fresh for originals. In Lillian’s case, he’d made a makeshift “trace detector” with flour and chalk, sprinkling it on the floor to reveal footprints the police had missed.
Crowe had also perfected an interrogation technique he called “mirror play.” He’d learned the basics watching Seattle PD interrogations in 1996 but added his own twist: instead of pressure, he mirrored the suspect’s behavior—mimicking their tone, gestures, even speech patterns—to make them relax and slip up. With Nicholas Blake, Crowe deliberately tapped his fingers on the table, echoing Blake’s nervous habit, and Blake, without realizing it, started talking more than he intended.
His favorite “gadget” remained a Moleskine notebook and a pencil, where he jotted everything from phone numbers to stray thoughts. But Crowe could make do with whatever was at hand. In a 2001 Chicago fraud case, when his camera died, he sketched a crime scene using charcoal from a fireplace, impressing even the police. In 2005, while tailing Michael Thorne in Lillian’s case, he used a shard of broken car mirror to watch him from around a corner without being spotted.
Crowe stood, grabbing his notebook and camera, and headed to the port warehouse on Alaskan Way where the 2004 heist had occurred. The drive took 20 minutes—Downtown traffic was heavy during lunch hour, and Crowe got stuck behind a tourist bus, its passengers peering out with cameras. On the sidewalk, he spotted a street artist, a 30-year-old man with dreadlocks and paint-splattered clothes, drawing portraits for $10. The artist called out to Crowe:
“Hey, sir, want a portrait? You look like a detective from a movie!”
“Thanks, but I’d rather solve crimes than pose for them,” Crowe replied with a faint smile, adding a touch of humor. “Though if you draw my robber, I’ll pay you double!”
At the warehouse, Crowe applied his “360 Method,” circling the crime scene and snapping photos from every angle. He noticed an old sign on the wall he’d overlooked last year: “Property of StarLink Innovations.” The name felt familiar, but he couldn’t place it.
In 2005, Seattle was a hub of tech and culture but for Crowe, those details were just background noise—his method of observation, logic, and improvisation was preparing him for the next step: revisiting Richard Mason and unraveling the mystery of the heist.
